Blogs: Vitacora y Edgeek

Me suplantan / I am being impersonated

The website calling itself "Fernando Diaz del Castillo Picks and Rambles" is in no way associated with me and is an abusive use of my name for a publicity scheme.

El sitio web llamado "Fernando Díaz del Castillo Picks and Rambles" no está asociado de ninguna manera conmigo y es un uso abusivo de mi nombre para un esquema publicitario.


Hace poco descubrí que un dominio del que solía ser dueño (y ya no me interesa) fue comprado por una empresa llamada 3D (según los registros públicos de GoDaddy), aparentemente ubicada en Bristol, U.K. Tanto el contacto administrativo como el técnico para dicha empresa son el mismo: Dior, Kristine translatorsclub@yahoo.com.

Esta empresa, utilizando este dominio que ya no me interesa tener (no lo nombraré aquí para no ayudarle en su PageRank o darle publicidad), publica una página en que utilizan abusivamente mi nombre para promocionar productos que yo jamás he recomendado. El sito utiliza mi nombre completo para promocionarse y engañar a quienes lo vean a pensar que yo recomiento productos, cosa que no hago. No avalo esos productos, ni los recomiendo, ni tengo nada que ver con ese sitio.

El sitio es llamado, descaradamente, "Fernando Díaz del Castillo Picks and Rambles". No está asociado de ninguna manera conmigo y es un uso abusivo de mi nombre para un esquema publicitario.

The site calling itself "Fernando Diaz del Castillo Picks and Rambles" is in no way associated with me and is an abusive use of my name for a publicity scheme.

Buscando solucionar el problema escribí al contacto técnico, quien respondió lo siguiente:

"Hi Fernando,

Would You like to buy Your domain back then?
It will be moved anyway in a few days and re-done, so if You want it it is up to You.

But do not let it run out next time, if You want to keep it.

Thank you
Kristine"

Tras responder que no me interesa el dominio, solamente que dejen de usar mi nombre abusivamente, me respondió lo siguiente:

"well, I am selling a domain off anyway some day soon, so i cannot guarantee or guess what then next person would do with it or even reply to your emails,
so it is just to let you know.

From my side - in respect of your email - no problems - (got to be moved anyway),
but what happen to it next - if it does not belong to you, then you will not be able to have any control over it.
so it just  to let you know.

kindest
kristine"

Poco podemos hacer para protegernos de abusos como estos, así que me limito a advertir: Mi único sitio web es www.fernandodiazdelcastillo.com; mis identidades en redes sociales (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn y Google+) están relacionadas en la esquina superior derecha de este sitio. Si encuentra un perfil o sitio web que no esté relacionado aquí, por favor utilice el formulario de contacto para informarme.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Frustrated with the #change11 RSS feed. Technical difficulties

I feel like I'm the only one having this problem, but it can't be. It's annoying and hinders my participation in the course. Us techies sometimes dismiss technical difficulties, but they can be a real obstacle.

My current problem is that the participants blogs RSS has some serious problems that haven't been addressed: I read the feed through Google reader and get a snippet of the test in each blog.

When I find something I want to read fully, I can't. I simply can't. Each post in the feed contains a title, that is linked to an error page like this one http://change.mooc.ca/cgi-bin/edurss02.cgi?rd=2471. They also contain a link after the word "from", which I understand to represent the source of the post. But clicking on it takes me to a page in Stephen Downes Web with information about the source of a feed. A feed. It seems random. Unrelated to what I want to read. Is it a strategy to make me read other stuff?

For example, this is taken (copy/paste) from my reader:

"Long post alert. As an additional post, this piece is part of the #change11 Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). It’s part of Week 3, on digital scholarship. What is a MOOC? Here’s a video introduction: Onward! Books are tools. Visiting … Continue reading → [From: TheUniversityBlog, September 29, 2011] [Comment]"

Clicking on TheUniversityBlog after "continue reading" takes me to information about a blog called "My learning blog" and nothing to do with the post I want to read.Clicking on "comments" takes to a comment page in grsshopper to comment on the post I haven't been able to read. Awesome!

I can't figure out a way to read the posts in the feed past the snippets I get through the RSS feed. I haven't been able to read any full posts.

Is it me? Is it my reader? Is there something I'm not getting? Is it a problem with the coding of the RSS aggregator in the Change 2011 platform? Or is it working well and I just don't understand how to read the posts through my Google Reader? Or am I not supposed to be able to access the full posts this way? Then how?

I have no idea what happens. But it's annoying and most importantly, I can't read what others post. I've tweeted about it to no avail. Would a blog post help? I guess not, but I get to whine and vent my frustration publicly.

Any help will be highly appreciated, if you manage to read the post and comment on it through my blog...

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Synchronous meeting with Martin Weller in #change 11 (Notes)

These are unedited notes taken during the synchronous meeting via Fuze on Sept. 28th, 2011 (11:00 am GMT-5).


When we look at what is being done in educational technology, many of the ideas are the same as what we talked about 5 years ago: Youtube, blogs, etc. Even though technology advances fast, this does not mean the field of ed. tech. has moved as fast.


Defining digital scholarship. Not come up with a definition. Is shorthand for three things come together: Open, Networked,

Digital. It's a mindset as well as the putting together of these three elements.

View of scholarship from the 90s: Discovery, Integration (interdisciplinary work), Application (putting the knowledge to work), Teaching. Survey of what scholars actually do. All things are important and have equal weight.

Tension in digital scholarship: We can do things we could not do before (like this course). Few scholars make use of Web 2.0 tools in their research and there seems to be resistence to these tools. Some even see them as dangerous.

Research found no evidence that the young, tech-savvy Doctoral students or Post Docs are changing the publishing practices of old.

Blogging is sort of counter-intuitive and opposite to the training of scientists: It supposed to be spontaneous, present incomplete ideas, parts of ideas, opinions. Scientists are trained to do the opposite (and publish in a peer reviewed journal).

Institutions are risk-resistant.

Research and research institutions are conservative.

Culture of blogging (tweeter): write, read others, comment... How does this culture relate to the academic culture of the disciplines.

Part of a definition of research is that advances are shared. It does not mentions scholarly journals or peer reviewing... Shared.

Universities have effectively outsourced evaluation of candidates to the publishers. It is those who publish. With this in mind, publishers have the power over who is a valuable scholar.

Proposal for digital scholarship:

  • Find digital equivalents
  • Guidelines that include it
  • Metrics
  • Peer-assessment
  • Micro-credit... blog posts = x points... Peer reviewed journals = y points.
  • Alternative methods

We tend to adapt technology to our current practices instead of allowing it to free us from past errors.

Should we formally recognise digital scholarship?

People who are tech. savvy can be dismissed, frowned upon, just because of this. This label could frighten young scholars from embracing digital scholarship. Being called a techie, labeled a techie, would be problematic for their future.

The conference format promotes peer-reviewed presentations... Other formats?


A few comments and questions that still roam in my geeky mind:

  • Could digital scholarship ever go mainstream? I feel this is really hard. It requieres a change in beliefs, attitudes, practices and also there are serious business interests in the current framework, especially from publishers. No one likes to relinquish his power. Digital scholarship can be a very interesting, rich option for people who are already part of the "digital world", read blogs, tweet, look for open access journals and create their own PLEs... But those who don't... I don't know!
  • What other formats of conference could be useful, valuable, accepted? Some unconference formats?
  • Institutions cannot requiere their scholars to go digital but governments can take some steps. The idea someone put up in the chat during the sessions and that I've seen online a few times now is very sound, powerful and interesting, but again, the publishing industry would be at risk: Every paper based on publicly funded research, should be freely available. Would there be anyone not part of the publishing business disagreeing with this? Scholars maybe, because they would lose income sources?

 

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Starting my first MOOC experience

I have to confess I started off a few weeks back with some curiosity and not very much motivation. I found out about a new Massive Open Online Course called Change: Education, Learning, and Technology and thought it was worth checking out. I'd heard quite a bit about other MOOCs and well... it's my area, I have to understand the idea less superficially.

I registered and got the introduction (orientation week) email today. I started watching the videos and getting excited. Some of G. Siemens' ideas in the interview were very interesting, especially about the connections and how they are broken in closed environments. I feel more and more that there enough tools that are similar and those that are not are too scarcely available, closed, expensive... I'm a big fan of Knowledge Forum and those are all problems I find in it. The ideas that drive it, knowledge building, cognitive responsibility and knowledge advancement seem more powerful than the current state of the technology.

They also resonate with Siemens. His view on the connections not being severed by not using closed platforms (pulling the plug, ending the course) seem work out limitations in what Scardamalia calls "ubiquity of knowledge creation", taking the learning everywhere with you. I am excited to learn more.

Downe's introduction was also interesting. The overwhelming amount of information he mentions will be a challenge, but a welcome one. It is not only in a MOOC that you have access to more information than you can process or even skim. It is in life. Making decisions or judgments with incomplete information is a reality of life all around, and making it part of a course can be really powerful. How will students cope? There will still be structure provided by the guest lecturers and materials provided by facilitators, but that will likely be a lot in itself. I don't believe it will be, as Stephen said, a "state of the art" of educational technology. I can quickly think of several big names in the field that are not (yet?) a part of the course. Not just big names, but big ideas. It will be a lot, anyway. Maybe those will turn up through what we, participants, bring in.

It will be overwhelming and I don't know how much I will be able to keep up. I'm so behind with work, that it isn't even funny to try something else. It's rather stupid. But I will, because now I am motivated. Just listening to the introductions got some crazy ideas running through my mind about running some sort of MOOC with middle schoolers next semester to end with an Educamp event in line with what Diego Leal help me put together a few years back. Seriously mad idea.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Pottermore, first quick impressions (a few spoilers)

Pottermore access email, also known as, Hogwarts Letter.Early access to J.K Rowling, WB, and Sony's Pottermore started last week for those first lucky million who won a golden ticket in the Quick Quill Challenge. I was among the lucky few who got into the beta through the Challenge, and got my "Hogwarts letter" on the 19th. I have been checking out the site for the past few days. It does look interesting and those who are inside are very excited. Those who aren't are a bit pissed, as replies to HP fan-actress Evanna Lynch's tweets have hinted @Evy_Lynch.

The site uses Flash (sorry iDevice users) to render 2-4 scenes per chapter (of the first book so far) in the Potter series with great taste. In each chapter, you can zoom in and out of the image and read up on some of the places, characters and objects. Some intersting new material is found here and there and a more glossary-like entry for most items and people.

Users are taken through the first book in the series and sorted into one of the four houses when Harry is. I'm a Ravenclaw. By following the story they get to simulate some soft of "going to Hogwars experience", but all through the eyes and story of Harry. No doing your own thing/aventure here.

They can win or lose House points by finding objects in the story (the Flash animations in each chapter), brewing potions or dueling (the latter two have been seriously glitchy). There will be a House Cup awarded and competition between the Houses has been fierce. Users can also friend each other and write comments in most sections of the site as well as upload their own drawing of characters, places and objects. That's nice! I've seen all sorts of great pictures and was surprised that many are not influenced by the movies. So far, that's the end of the interactive-social-sharing features.

But I wished for more. I expected more. The Harry Potter fandom has long been an example of online creativity and  community. Henry Jenkins highlights these aspects in Convergence Culture (2006). Discussion of the canon is one of the main aspects of Potter fandom. Forums devoted to discussing ideas in the books still have thousands of users and active discussions (though since the last book came out they sure have been losing momentum). With the promise of new material I expected interesting discussions about the relation between this and the series. But the comments sections are no good for this. For once, they're not threaded, making it impossible to have a discussion of any kind. And they are not placed in the story, but in the objects, places and people encyclopedia-like entries. They are hard to follow and find. I asked a question and was almost unable to find it again to look for replies. Not to say try and find replies without threads! This constructive aspect of HP fandom was totally overlooked.

The other amazing feature of online Potter fandom is fan fiction (again, see Jenkins 2006). I didn't have high hopes for this, but it's totally absent from Pottermore. I was probably naïve to think it would be a part of the site.

Despite these two big issues, Pottermore has been a fun engulfing experience. But what is it? It's not the books turned webpage: those aren't even there. I'd expected to find e-versions, but I guess that will come later, with other merchandise and a cost. Which fan wouldn't want to buy their wand or house scarf? The site recommends you read the book while you navigate through Pottermore, but it's not an attempt at transmedia storytelling, either. You do not need Pottermore to be in the loop with the story. So far it doesn't add much to it. Let's hope it will. As for the movies, they don't add to the books (I'd argue they subtract), so the whole books-movies-Pottemore trio is not really transmedia... It's also not a game. There is no agency from the user in the story (other than the House Cup). It's not a book, not a game, not really transmedia... what is Pottermore? I still have no clue. Maybe an attempt at a new genre, but it's been fun!

We'll have to see what happens when all the beta feedback is worked out and the bugs are fixed. There have been very many bugs. It's like the site got a Bat Bogey hex from Ginny!

 


Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

 

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Redes sociales y estudiantes

Las redes sociales en Internet se han popularizado enormemente en los últimos cinco años y están aquí para quedarse, gústenos o no. Facebook ya cuenta con más 600 millones usuarios y Twitter tiene más de 110 millones. Nuestros estudiantes, aún quienes no tienen la edad para hacerlo (13 años según Facebook), tienen cuentas en estas redes y las usan a diario. ¿Qué debemos hacer? ¿Qué les debemos enseñar sobre estas redes y el manejo de Internet? ¿Qué podemos hacer con estas redes para apoyar los procesos de aprendizaje que lideramos? ¿Qué cuidados debemos tener y cómo podemos proteger a nuestros estudiantes de los peligros que vemos en los medios? En esta presentación-taller exploramos algunas de estas preguntas, empezando por ¿qué es una red social?

 

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Reviví mi PS3

My PS3 died, the dreaded YLoD. I found a couple good guides online to fix it, got the tools and materials and did the whole reflow thing... and it worked! Links to repair guides below the video.


My PS3 murió el fin de semana. El temido YLoD (Yellow Lead of Death). Encontré buenas guías en línea, conseguí las herramientas y materiales (pistola de calor y pasta térmica), seguí las instrucciones y... ¡funcionó! Bajo el video una lista de recursos para el arreglo.

Recursos para arreglar el YLoD:

El arreglo no es permanente ni garantizado. A algunos les dura unas horas, a otros semanas, a otros meses y otros les sigue funcionando. El mío estuvo prendido como cuatro horas justo después del arreglo sin problemas. Ojalá siga durando.

 

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Murió mi PS3

 

Murió mi PS3. El temido YLoD, Yellow Led of Death.

PS3 YLoD, teadown

Ya lo desarmé y estoy esperando a mañana para comprar una pasta térmica y una pistola de calor barata para intentar el primer arreglo. Si eso no lo soluciona, es posible que sea la unidad de poder. Así, me toca conseguir una de respuesto, nueva o usada. Por como se veían el "heatsink" y CPU cuando los saqué, creo que puede ser por ahí. Ojalá. Ese es un arreglo medio complicado, pero barato.

Movistar

Todas las mañanas, cuando vengo oyendo radio desde mi iPhone camino al trabajo y se corta la transmisión por mala velocidad de la red movil, pienso que quiero escribir algo al respecto del servicio de mi abusivo y patético proveedor, Movistar. Así que aprovecho que hace rato no escribo para poner dos quejas a la nada, que es lo mismo que ponerlas en Movistar, en la línea *611 o por la página web:

1. Qué abuso la letra menudo del plan de datos. Básicamente dice que le dan un servicio con velocidad de 1MB, a menos que lo use bastante, momento en el cual le reducen la velocidad a 1/4 o 1/8 de lo que prometen en la letra grande. En breve, le damos un buen servicio a menos que lo use. Dice la letra menuda: "En el plan de iPhone 140 la velocidad bajará a 128 Kbps después de 1GB de consumo. En los planes iPhone 190, 400 y 800 la velocidad bajará a 256 Kbps después de 4Gb de consumo. La velocidad se restablecerá en el corte de facturación. Aplican condiciones de buen uso de la línea."

2. Desde el iOS 2 Apple dio la posibilidad de utilizar el teléfono para conectar un computador a Internet, como módem (y desde iOS 4.3 son conectar por USB). Había visto hace tiempo a usuario de Blackberry haciendo esto desde el Blackberry Desktop y me daba envidia. No estando en casa y pagando un plan caro de datos, me parecía apenas natural que pudiera usar la red del teléfono para navegar en aeropuertos y otros lugares. Sin embargo, esto depende de que el operador habilite la opción en los archivos de configuración del servicio que se autoinstalan con las actualizaciones en iTunes. Movistar no lo ha habilitado. Tigo y Comcel sí. En el *611 no me dieron ninguna información. Simplemente que ese servicio no estaba disponible para el iPhone. No me dijeron que fuera por restricciones de Movistar, sino que me trataron de convencer que era culpa del teléfono, que este no tenía la opción. Patético.

En breve, odio mi proveedor de celular. Espero que llegue Julio, con la portabilidad numérica, para cambiarme y llevarme mi número.

De paso... si uno firma una cláusula de permanencia y esta se vence, acaba, etc... ¿No debería el operador estar obligado a desbloquearle a uno el teléfono, que es de uno, que uno pagó, que pagó durante la duración de la cláusula con la factura y con el pago por compra del aparato pero ellos mantienen amarrado con las bandas cerradas? Es apenas decente, lógico que sea así... pero no. Maldito Movistar. Un iPhone nuevo vale 300 USD en USA, con plan de AT&T. Sin reposición ni nada. Algo cercano a $700,000 En Movistar vale, sin reposición, $1,500,000. Un iPhone con factory unlock vale alrededor de eso en los países donde la legislación está a favor del usuario y no del abusivo operador, como Francia y Australia, donde está prohibido vender teléfonos con bandas cerradas. Aquí cobran eso por uno con las bandas cerradas. Abusivos. Descarados.

Odio a Movistar. Mi iPhone lo compré en MercadoLibre y gracias al excelente trabajo del Dev-Team está desbloqueado y fuera de la cárcel... De paso... Apple cada vez me cae más gordo. Se han vuelto tan malévolos y abusivos como Microsoft. 

 

 

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.